Board effectiveness
Review board and committee structure, skills, delegation and reporting.
EDUCATION CONSULTANCY / GOVERNANCE
Strengthen board oversight, assurance mapping and evidence-led decisions.
Book a MAT discovery call →Explore all MAT servicesWho we support
Trustees, chairs, governance professionals and accounting officers. We focus on practical advice, clear accountability and proportionate assurance.
Review board and committee structure, skills, delegation and reporting.
Connect the strategic risk register to internal scrutiny, external audit and improvement tracking.
Review declarations of interest, safeguarding oversight, decision records and statutory publication duties.
DfE standards & assurance
A required statutory audit or inspection is different from a recommended management review. Applicability depends on the trust, buildings, systems and activity. The 2026 Academy Trust Handbook is effective from 1 October 2026.
Academy Trust Handbook internal scrutiny programme, audit and risk committee, external audit and annual accounts obligations.
Review compliance with articles, funding agreement and relevant DfE governance requirements; a standalone external governance audit is not universally mandated.
Board effectiveness diagnostic, assurance map, policy gap analysis and action tracker.
Understand the trust structure, objectives, current assurance and key constraints.
Examine documents, interviews, data and evidence against the agreed scope.
Present a prioritised action plan, ownership, timescales and optional implementation support.
Practical answers for academy trust leaders. Check current DfE guidance and obtain professional advice for trust-specific decisions.
It sets out requirements and expectations for academy trust financial management and governance. Trusts should use the edition currently in force.
Academy trusts must meet the Handbook requirements for audit and risk oversight. Committee arrangements should be checked against the current rules and trust structure.
Skills, challenge, information quality, delegation, meeting practice, committee structure, conflicts of interest and action follow-through.
No. A standalone external governance review is not universally required; it may be commissioned to strengthen assurance or respond to specific circumstances.
Maintain declarations, identify conflicts for each decision, follow the trust’s policies and record appropriate exclusions and approvals.
It documents which decisions are reserved to members, trustees, committees, executives and school leaders, supporting clear accountability.
Material risks, causes, impacts, controls, owners, residual ratings, planned actions and reporting arrangements.
Through clear accountability, appropriate policies, assurance reporting, training and escalation consistent with current safeguarding guidance.
Internal scrutiny is risk-based assurance over controls during the year; external audit is a separate independent annual financial assurance process.
Review frequency should reflect statutory requirements, policy risk, organisational change and relevant guidance updates.
Accurate minutes, decision records, risk reporting, policy approvals, challenge, action tracking and timely management information.
An evidence-based gap analysis, prioritised recommendations, ownership and a board-level improvement plan.